cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
VERSTEK
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Hukum Acara Fakultas Hukum UNS
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 135 Documents
PUTUSAN LEPAS (ONSLAG VAN ALLE RECT VERVOLGING) DENGAN ALASAN JUDEX FACTIE MENGABAIKAN AHLI BPKP DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG ) Suki Putri, Jeelyke Nilaria
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the prosecutors building laws, in asking the reason   the  reason  in  order  to  appeal  against  the  decision  off  Judex  factie  and legal  argument  Judge  Appeals  to  consider  the  reason  the  appeal  of  the  Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court No.1036.K/Pid.Sus/2010.This research is a normative prescriptive law, USING case approach. The type  of  material  used  is  a  source  of  law  primary  legal  materials  in  the  form  of Law No. 8  of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code), Act No. 5 of 2004 on amendments to the Law No. 14 year 1985 on the Supreme Court, Law Number  31  of  1999  on  the  eradication  of  corruption,  as  amended  and supplemented by Act 20 of 2001 Number. Secondary sources of legal materials in the form of books, papers, papers, articles, source of internet-related, and other legal materials in the form of tertiary Big Indonesian Dictionary, law dictionary. Technical analysis of the legal materials is to use deductive analysis is to draw conclusions from things that are common to the problems faced concrete.
PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PENGADILAN ANAK DALAM KASUS PENCABULAN DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI BOYOLALI (Nomor Perkara : 15/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.BI) INDRO SUHARTO, AZIS INDRO SUHARTO
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

in  Boyolali  First  Instance  Court  jurisdiction.  The  objective  is  to  find  out  the constraints  the  judge  faces  as  well  as  the  attempt  of  coping  with  such  the constraints. The child is not the same as adult so that in the procedural process should  be  observed  that  it  is  different  from  that  for  adult.  There  should  be  a special court with the rules different from that of  general court.This study was an empirical  research  type  that  was  normative  descriptive  in  nature  using  a  case study. The location of research the writer used was Boyolali First Instance Court. The  type  of  data  used  included  primary  and  secondary  data.  Techniques  of collecting data used were observation, interview and library study on both book and  legislation.  Those  primary  and  secondary  data  were  then  analyzed qualitatively so that an accurate description was achieved concerning the result of  research.  Based  on  the  research,  it  could  be  found  that  in  the  process  of resolving the indecency crime with minor perpetrator in Boyolali First Instance Court, the judge handling the case had referred to the Act No.3 of 1997 about the Child Court. Thus, in this enactment of act, a strong legal foundation is obtained to differentiate the treatment to the child involved in a crime. Such the treatment differentiation was began during the examination process from investigation level to sentencing process in the trial that was conducted specifically corresponding to what governed in Child Trial Act.
PUTUSAN LEPAS (ONSLAG VAN ALLE RECT VERVOLGING) DENGAN ALASAN JUDEX FACTIE MENGABAIKAN AHLI BPKP DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG (No. 1036 K/Pid Sus/2010)) Suki Putri, Jeelyke Nilaria
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the prosecutors building laws, in asking the reason   the  reason  in  order  to  appeal  against  the  decision  off  Judex  factie  and legal  argument  Judge  Appeals  to  consider  the  reason  the  appeal  of  the  Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court No.1036.K/Pid.Sus/2010.This research is a normative prescriptive law, USING case approach. The type  of  material  used  is  a  source  of  law  primary  legal  materials  in  the  form  of Law No. 8  of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code), Act No. 5 of 2004 on amendments to the Law No. 14 year 1985 on the Supreme Court, Law Number  31  of  1999  on  the  eradication  of  corruption,  as  amended  and supplemented by Act 20 of 2001 Number. Secondary sources of legal materials in the form of books, papers, papers, articles, source of internet-related, and other legal materials in the form of tertiary Big Indonesian Dictionary, law dictionary. Technical analysis of the legal materials is to use deductive analysis is to draw conclusions from things that are common to the problems faced concrete.
PERMOHONAN PRAPERADILAN OLEH LEMBAGA SWADAYA MASYARAKAT (LSM) SELAKU PIHAK KETIGA TERHADAP BERLARUT-LARUTNYA PENYIDIKAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 01/Pra/2012/PN.Bi) PRASTOWO, BAYU
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  dasar  kedudukan  hukum Lembaga  Swadaya  Masyarakat  (LSM)  selaku  pihak  ketiga  dalam  pengajuan praperadilan  dan  untuk  mengetahui  dasar  permohonan  praperadilan  yang didasarkan  pada  berlarut-larutnya  proses  penyidikan  pada  kasus  tindak  pidana korupsi.  Berdasarkan  hasil  penelitian  dan  pembahasan  maka  diperoleh kesimpulan  Lembaga  Swadaya  Masyarakat  (LSM)  selaku  pihak  ketiga  dalam pengajuan praperadilan pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi mempunyai kedudukan hukum  dalam  mengajukan  praperadilan  dalam  perkara  korupsi.  Penyidikan perkara  korupsi  yang  berlarut-larut  jika  dilihat  dari  sudut  pandang  hukum positifis  dan  progresif  terdapat  perbedaan  pandangan.  Menurut  sudut  pandang positifis berlarut-larutnya penyidikan bukan merupakan suatu bentuk penghentian penyidikan  karena  menurut  KUHAP  syarat  disebut  sebagai  suatu  penghentian penyidikan harus ada Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3), sedangkan menurut  sudut  pandang  hukum  progresif  berlarut-larutnya  penyidikan  dapat dikategorikan penghentian penyidikan secara tidak sah. Penghentian penyidikan tidak  harus  diartikan  dengan  adanya  Surat  Perintah  Penghentian  Penyidikan (SP3)  tetapi  dengan  adanya  suatu  penyidikan  yang  berlarut-larut  maka  dapat dikategorikan penghentian penyidikan semu.
KONSTRUKSI HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP SURAT DAKWAAN YANG DISUSUN SECARA ALTERNATIF DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SUKOHARJO NOMOR 204/PID.SUS/2011/PN.SKH. Dewi, Dinar Mahardiyanti
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the prosecutors rationale in drafting legal construction with alternative indictment in the   case of under age molestation and the  effect of prosecutor evidence against the indictment which made alternatives  in  proving  the  defendants  offense.This  is  prescriptive  normative  research, discovered the law in abstracto and in concreto on the prosecutors rationale in drafting  legal  construction  and  the  effect  of  prosecutor  evidence  in  proving  the  defendants  offense.  The  data  used  is  secondary  data.  With  the  sources  primary legal  materials,  legal  materials,  secondary  and  tertiary  legal  materials.  This research  reveals  that,  the  prosecutors  rationale  in  drafting  legal  construction with  alternative  indictment  are  the  prosecutors  uncertainty  about  the qualifications or the  appropriate  article to be applied on offense which done by defendant  and  to  minimize  the  chances  of  escape  of  the  defendant  from  the charges. Second, effect of prosecutor evidence against the indictment which made alternatives in proving the defendants offense are facilitate judges in determining the the defendant guilt and Proven first indictment in indictment.
STUDI PENANGANAN KORUPSI MENGENAI PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK BANDARA NAMNIWEL DALAM STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI AMBON NOMOR:06/PID.B/2011 Lestari, Ika Puji
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This   is  a  normative  legal  research.  The  approach  uses  qualitative approach  method.  Using   secondary  data  from  references  including  books, literature,  laws  and  regulations,  official  documents,  research  results  are intangible reports and other resources related to this research. The Data obtained analyzed with the content analysis (content analysis,) against the verdict of all the demands  of  the  judges  (Onslag  Van  Alle  Rechts  Vervolging)  corruption  in  the procurement  of  land  for  the  Airport  Namniwel.  Legal  resources  gathering techniques  used  in  library  studies  and  references  and  the  internet.  Research analysis  used  the  deductive  syllogism  is  a  collection  of  research  sources  to interpret the related norms, then the research sources processed and analyzed to answer  the  problems  examined.  The  last  stage  is  to  draw  conclusions  from  the studies that were  processed, so that in the end can be known why the judge threw the  verdict  out  of  all  the  demands  of  the  judges  (Onslag  Van  Alle  Rechts Vervolging) corruption in the procurement of land for the Airport Namniwel.Based on the research conclusions may be drawn that in dropped verdict off against the defendant Arifin Soamole, according to judge the defendant has been proven  lawfully  according  to  law  do  the  deed  charged  him  as  arraignment  one and second of arraignment prosecutors general, but deeds the defendant was not constitute  a  criminal  act,  as  in  an  indictment  one  and  second  and  of  efforts  to legal be done by the prosecutors against the ruling off of them are appeal, kasasi, and  review  (PK)  but  under  terms  of  article  244  KUHAP,  accused  or  public  prosecutor entitled to ask appeal against judgment of a court first rate against the award except free.
STUDI PENANGANAN KORUPSI AUDIT PEMBANGKIT TENAGA LISTRIK DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 216 K/Pid.Sus/2009 PUTRI, OKTIVIA PRAMITA
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on the results of this study, it could be  concluded that the basis of an appeal by the prosecution to prove that the Judex  factie  decision is not free in the case of pure corruption audit powerhouse with the defendant Ir. Darwin Abbas  which  is in conformity with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The prosecution argument to boils down is that the South Jakarta District Court has passed a ruling in check and try the case "does  not  apply  the  rules  of  law  or  apply  the  law  not  as  it  should  be"  of  Article  253 paragraph (1) letter a Criminal Code). Prosecutor reason to appeals in the Supreme Court considered  that  the  reasons  are  justified  and  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the Criminal Procedure Code. Justices of the Supreme Court agrees with the prosecution that it is true Judex factie  not apply the law or apply the law not as it should be. From that judgment the Supreme Court granted a prosecution appeal and the verdict free from all charges or acquittal called impure because of what the charges are proven even if the act is not a criminal act. This is in accordance with the provisions of Article 191 paragraph (2)  Criminal  Procedure  Code  stating  that  if  the  acts  charged  against  the  defendant  has been proven, but the act was not a crime then it should be cut off from all charges.
ANALISA PENGAJUAN UPAYA HUKUM KASASI OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN LEPAS DARI SEGALA TUNTUTAN HUKUM DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN M.A. No. 1036K/PidSus/2010 Windrasmara, Pito Junar
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  Pengajuan  Upaya  Hukum Kasasi  Oleh  Penuntut  Umum  Terhadap  Putusan  Dilepas  Dari  Segala  Tuntutan Hukum (Onslag Van Alle  Rechtsvervolging)  Dalam Perkara Korupsi (studi kasus dalam Putusan MA No. 1036k/Pid-Sus/2010 tanggal 28 April 2011).Hasil  peneliti  menunjukkan  alasan-alasan  pengajuan  kasasi  yang diajukan  oleh  jaksa  penuntut  umum  dalam  putusan  bebas  terhadap  terdakwa Hamnir  yang  dijatuhkan  oleh  Pengadilan   Negeri  Palopo  diterima  oleh  hakim pada  Mahkamah  Agung  pertimbangan  hakim  pada  Mahkamah  Agung menunjukkan kontruksi hukum yang objektif dan logis. Argumentasi hakim pada Mahkamah  Agung  disusun  atas  dasar  keilmuan  yang  bisa dipertanggungjawabkan.
KONSTRUKSI PEMBUKTIAN HAKIM TERHADAP PEMBEBASAN DAKWAAN PRIMAIR DALAM PERKARA PERJUDIAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 117/Pid.B/2011/PN.KENDAL) Fitria Sari, Putri Mei
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The  purpose  of  this  law  writing  is  to  determine  the  judge  legalconsiderations  of  construction  evidence  acquit the defendant  of  proving  that  theprimary  charges  in  gambling  proceedings  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  ofthe Criminal Procedure Code.This study  included to the  normative  legal research.  The approach  used is case  approach  method.  The  types  of  data  used  are  secondary  data  with  library materials,  which  is  include:  books,  literature,  legislation,  official  documents, research results  in the form of  reports and  other sources  related to this research. Data obtained and analyzed with content analysis.This research resulted that the judge consideration acquit the defendant of the  primary charges  in accordance  with the provisions of  the Criminal Procedure Code  for  verification  has  been  done  with  the  evidence  in  accordance  with  the provisions  and  consideration  of  the  judge  in  accordance  with  the  evidence  and conditions.The benefit derived from this study is to provide input to the judge in order to  give consideration  to decide a  criminal case,  the judge  is expected  to  assess  all of  the  things  carefully  and  meticulously.  Thus,  it  is  needed  the  necessary evaluation and  periodic  training  for judges to  improve performance  in  order to enhance  the professionalism of  a judge  in order to  uphold  justice  and the  rule of law.
PENGABAIAN SAKSI VERBALISM OLEH JUDEX FACTIE SEBAGAI ALASAN PENGAJUAN KASASI TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2627 K/Pid.Sus/2010 UTAMI, MUTIARA RESKY
VERSTEK Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This  research  aims  are  to  find  out  whether  the  verbalism  witness overlooking by judex factie in evidence examination as justification for the public prosecutor  in  filing  appeal  to  the  supreme  court  in  verdict  of  freedom  in  drugs case has met the  penal procedural law  as well as to find out the construction of the Supreme Court’s Judge in assessing the reason of public prosecutor’s appeal to  the  Supreme  Court.  This  is  a  normative  legal  research  using  primary  and secondary law materials. Technique of collecting data used was library study to collect the material law by means of reading legislations, official documents and literatures relevant to the problem studied. Technique of analyzing data used was deductive logic technique.The result of research showed that firstly, the reason of appeal to Supreme Court the Public Prosecutor filed had not met the provision of Article  253  clause  (1)  of  Code  of  Criminal  Procedure  because  the  reason  used was  that  beyond  the  juridical  provision,  namely  the  result  of  authentication. Secondly, the legal construction of the Supreme Court’s judge in investigating the case was corresponding to the provision because the appeal to the Supreme Court was filed against the verdict of freedom.

Page 1 of 14 | Total Record : 135