Setyanta, Yustinus Budi
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lakidende Unaaha

Published : 2 Documents
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DEKONSTRUKSI PADA PERAN TOKOH UTAMA DALAM NOVEL RABET: RUNTUHNYA JERMAN TIMUR KARYA MARTIN JANKOWSKI Setyanta, Yustinus Budi
DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2015): DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lakidende Unaaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Deconstruction is a method of reading the text very carefully to find inconsistencies and paradoxes in the concepts of the text as a whole by turning the existing oppositions. The elements are deconstructed is the element that determines the text. Deconstruction on the main prominent role in novel Rabet: Runtuhnya Jerman Timur by Martin Jankowski generate some binary opposition, i.e., capitalist-socialist, West German-East German, rich-poor, rebel-fighters, and cage-palace. Results deconstruction of the Socialist paradox shows that the main character misinterprets binary opposition between the capitalist and socialist because actually, socialists higher rank than capitalist. Results deconstruction of the paradox of East Germany, the main character misinterprets binary opposition between East Germany and West Germany because of East Germany get a higher place than West Germany. Results deconstruction of the paradox of poor, indicating that the main character misinterprets binary opposition between rich and poor because in fact, the people of East Germany was not poor. Results deconstruction of the paradox fighters showed that the main character as a representation of a warrior, it turns out, when viewed from the side of the East German government, as rebels because the East German government actually was a good purpose for its citizens, which is making its citizens prosper. Results deconstruction of the paradox enclosure indicates that the main character is not actually born in a stable because of the fact that the East German government to the welfare or well-being to its citizens.Keywords: deconstruction, the main character, binary opposition, paradoxically
HESITATIF SEBAGAI PELENGKAP JENIS TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI MENURUT SEARLE Setyanta, Yustinus Budi
DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2015): DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lakidende Unaaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The goal of this study is expressing teacher’s speech acts in academic interaction at Indonesian class in Wisma Bahasa Yogyakarta. This study used qualitative approach in pragmatics aspect. The data collection that used in this study is nonparticipative observation with record and written technic. In this method two research subjects that have specific characteristic is used. The data research focused on the teacher’s speech acts in Wisma Bahasa Yogyakarta who teach Indonesian in natural speech. In line with the research goal, the result of this study show that the kinds of speech acts is devided into six categories, those are (a) assertive speech acts, (b) hesitative speech acts, (c) directive speech acts, (d) expressive speech acts, (e) comissive speech acts, and (f) declarative speech acts. Assertive speech acts is marked with the using of proposition which indicate of speaker conviction in his utterance. Hesitative speech acts is marked with the using of proposition which indicate the speaker unbelieveable in his utterance. Directive speech acts is classified into two terms, those are to express believeable and also unbelieveable proposition in his utterance can do by the speaker. Expressive speech acts is classified into two terms, those are to express evaluation, directly or indirectly. Comissive speech act is classified into two terms, those are to express that the listener has believeable and also unbelieveable to do what is said in his utterance. Declarative speech acts is classified into three terms, those are to express that the speaker give permission, forbiden, and give limitation. Hesitative speech act in this study have not been embodied in the classification of types of speech according to Searle, whereas hesitatif speech act is not something impossible in a speech. Sometimes speaker not have conviction of truth utterance.Keywords: Utterance, Speech Acts, Academic Interaction, BIPA Teachers