Tongat Tongat
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

PANCASILA SEBAGAI DASAR FALSAFAH NEGARA DAN MAKNA FILOSOFISNYA DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL Tongat, Tongat
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 3, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2736.322 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.3.2012.399-406

Abstract

Abstract In more than three decades of government?especially in the era of New Order?Pancasila more "identical" with power. The interpretation and meaning of Pancasila more monopolized authority. Mean to be so symbolic. Pancasila was given more "quality" as symbols of ideological-normative that essentially  away from substantial meaning. Pancasila stuck in a world that is not honest and not authentic. Therefore, once the New Order collapsed, the community is reluctant, even shy away from speaking the Pancasila in public spaces. Reluctance and public anxiety to Pancasila actually pretty alarming in the context of national and state life. Therefore, implementing it in an honest?included in the national criminal law reform?is a necessity. Key words : Pancasila, philosophy groundslag, penal reform   Abstrak   Dalam dua orde pemerintahan di Indonesia?khususnya pada era orde baru?Pancasila lebih ?diidentikkan? dengan kekuasaan. Penafsiran dan pemaknaannya lebih dimonopoli penguasa. Maknanya menjadi demikian simbolik. Ia lebih diberi ?bobot? sebagai simbol-simbol idiologis-normatif yang?sejatinya?menjauhkan dari makna substansialnya. Pancasila terpasung dalam dunia yang tidak jujur dan tidak otentik. Karenanya, begitu ketika Orde Baru runtuh, masyarakat enggan, bahkan menghindar untuk berbicara Pancasila di ruang publik. Keengganan dan kegamangan publik terhadap Pancasila sesungguhnya cukup mengkhawatirkan dalam konteks kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Oleh karenanya, implementasinya secara jujur?termasuk dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana nasional?menjadi keniscayaan. Kata Kunci : Pancasila, dasar falsafah negara, pembaharuan hukum pidana
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DAN PROSPEK KEBIJAKAN IDEALNYA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA Tongat, Tongat
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 42, Nomor 4, Tahun 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2477.514 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.42.4.2013.542-548

Abstract

Crime prevention through the means of criminal law with the conventional characteristics expensive, unjust, immoral and failure continues to be a central issue of criminal law. Criminal law is also constantly criticized for its negative impacts such as stigmatization, dehumanization and prisonization which tend to be crimi:10genic. State's failure to meet "promise" to protect citizens from crime continues to be a global issue roll away. The central role of the state, monopolistic in the crime prevention is also constantly harassed. State "required" divide the role in the prevention of crime proportionally with the community. Restorative justice which carries the '!balance of role idea in the prevention of crime be interesting issue that deserves appreciate academically.
FREED INDONESIA’S CORRUPTION BETWEEN HOPE AND REALITY Tongat, Tongat; Prasetyo, Said Noor
The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Table Of Content
Publisher : The 2nd Proceeding “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020"

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (7474.054 KB)

Abstract

Although the title of this article implies pessimism, but semantically title of this article is not intended to convey the message of pessimism in fighting corruptions.The title of this article actually more of reflective questions in social achievement to provide confirmation, that the eradication of corruption in Indonesia is very likely just be the "hope", but also very likely to be "true". In condition of Indonesia today, expectations and reality in eradication of corruption can be considered equally still be a tendency. At least there are a series of facts that can be used as an argumentation for an existence of two point that tendencies.
Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pidana Nasional (Telaah Kritis Larangan Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana) Tongat, Tongat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1235

Abstract

A paradigm shift in the state of life—especially post the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 amendments—have not been fully understood  properly. Up to now—included in the lawless life—is still a gap between the paradigm and its implementation . This paradigmatic gap visible example of the lack of a comprehensive implementation of the basic principles of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 in a national criminal law reform ( draft Code of Criminal Law ) . The draft Code of Criminal Law as one form of national criminal law reform is seen has not fully represent constitution demands. Prohibiting the   use of analogy in criminal law is still seen at odds with the provisions of Article 1 ( 3 ) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. The gap is not only paradigmatic potential to cause difficulties in its application, but also potentially the cancellation clause in the legislation  concerned.
Interseksi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Sharī‘ah di Indonesia Arifin, Syamsul; Muthohirin, Nafik; Tongat, Tongat; Wahyudi, Wahyudi
ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 12 No 2 (2018): Maret
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.623 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2018.12.2.261-287

Abstract

This article attempts to uncover the point of encounter of human rights and sharī‘ah in Indonesia which often contradict with each other in light of differences in its development base, both as a concept and, furthermore, as an instrument, which ultimately leads to the human dimension. The basis of the development in question is that human rights derived from human rationality, while sharī‘ah comes from revelation. Therefore, this article seeks to explore the compatibility between the two. Human rights and sharī‘ah always have a point of encounter because in principle they are both fighting for humanity. The intersection between the two is often the case—and it becomes common, because the basis for the development of the law originates from different sources. Human rights comes from human rationality, while sharī‘ah departs from Allah’s revelation. Thus, it is only natural that various debates arise as in general a discourse of knowledge. It’s just that it needs to be understood that the conflict and tension that arise, should not lead to violence. On the one hand, Muslim groups who reject the principles of human rights are undoubtedly existent. However, on the other hand, many Muslims also graciously accept human rights. Accommodative people hold the view that they have a common vision of justice, peace, equality and tolerance. Human rights need not be viewed as contradictory to Islam, in part because many Muslim-majority countries recognize and ratify human rights instruments issued by the United Nations.
DEKONSTRUKSI STELSEL ABSORPSI DALAM PERBARENGAN TINDAK PIDANA SEBAGAI UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF Tongat, Tongat
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 44, No 2 (2015): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4221.117 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.44.2.2015.216-223

Abstract

This study aims to address the central issue of the public emergence of alleged lack of consistency in imposing criminal judge in the case perbarengan crime. The method used is normative research. Construction of the existing criminal stelsel in perbarengan criminal offense not to give clarity to the judge in a convict. So too there is no minimum threshold should be clear criminal judge imposed, thereby potentially causing injustice, especially when compared to criminal punishment in the case of a single criminal actPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab isu sentral munculnya dugaan publik atas tidak adanya konsistensi hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana dalam hal terjadi perbarengan tindak pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif. Konstruksi existing tentang stelsel pidana dalam perbarengan tindak pidana tidak memberi kejelasan kepada hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana. Demikianpun tidak ada batas minimum pidana yang jelas yang harus dijatuhkan hakim, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakadilan khususnya jika dibandingkan dengan penjatuhan pidana pada kasus tindak pidana tunggal