Yogia Prihartini
IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Published : 13 Documents
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : ARABIYAT

DIRÂSAH TAHLÎLIYYAH TAQWÎMIYYAH ‘AN AL-MUFRADÂT FÎ KITÂB MANÂN AL-AZÎZ Buska, Wahyudi; Prihartini, Yogia; Hasnah, Nur
Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban | Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2018
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/a.v5i2.6921

Abstract

The fundamental problem in this research was how relevant the vocabulary in Arabic book Manan al-Aziz is to a higher level in Indonesia. This study amis to: (1) find out the vocabulary in Manan Aziz's book in terms of number, type, position and method, and (2) know the advantages and disadvantages of the book of Manan Aziz. This was a library research employing evaluation analysis method. Data sources were: The Arabic Teaching Book used for grades 10, 11 and 12 in secondary schools in Indonesia, written by Manan Al Aziz in 2009. The results of this study were: new vocabulary in Manan Aziz book after less repetition (53 words) means 693 vocabularies. The number of vocabularies that must be taught to Arabic for speakers of other languages were 1500/2000 words for advanced level, starting with a large number of words in class eleven is 302 words, then in the twelfth line means 242 words
ANALYSIS OF TEST ITEM ON THE FINAL TEST SEMESTER EXAM ON ARABIC SUBJECTS Prihartini, Yogia; Buska, Wahyudi; Hasnah, Nur
Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban | Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2019
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/a.v6i1.10926

Abstract

This research is aimed; (a) to give a description about Arabic final semester test questions arrangements procedure at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. (b) to give a description about the quality of the test as seen from its validity, reliability, difficulty, and differentiation capacity. (c) to give a description that the lecturers never did an exam questions analysis of Arabic exam subject at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This research uses the descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data. The population within this research is the college students of Tadris major in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training who follows the final semester exam of 2017-2018 tenet years, especially in Arabic test subject. The sample taken during this research is the college students from the Tadris major, who followed the final semester exam on Arabic subject, by using the purpose sampling technique. The data collecting technique used was documentation, interview, and questionnaires. The results of this research are (1) the types of this tests are achievement test from the teaching objectives aspect, teacher-made test from the arrangement aspect, summative test from the time of implementation aspect, written test from the method of performing aspects, and subjective test from the answer scoring aspect, (2) the quality of Arabic test year 2017/2018: (a) validity sufficient, (b) test reliability is high which is 0,74, (c) the difficulty is easy earning it a ‘bad’ category, which is 45 numbers of questions or 11,11%, (d) the differentiation capacity is bad, which is 45 numbers of questions, or 22,22%, (3) the reason why the lecturers and question maker team did not held a question analysis are as follows: (a) some of the Arabic lecturers in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang are not scholars of Arabic education major or not lenient with S-1 and S-2 academic degree, (b) they have zero experience in doing test analysis, (c) there is no order from the authorities which motivates the lecturers in doing test analysis, (d) the lack of understanding about analysis, and (e) there are lecturers who have never received training or seminar about evaluation and analysis.