Yudhi Hanggara
Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Published : 10 Documents
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION, INKUIRI TERBIMBING DAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BLORA Hanggara, Yudhi
Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.639 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) which learning model providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning, (2) which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity, and (3) in each creativity level, which one providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning model. In each learning model which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity. The population of research was all students of Junior High Schools throughout Blora Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 272 students: 92 in the first experiment class, 91 in the second experiment class, and 89 in the third experiment class. The result of research showed that: (1) PBI model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did, but provided learning achievement equally good to the Conventional learning model did and Conventional learning model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did; (2) the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with both medium and low creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. (3) In PBI and guided inquiry learning models, the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with low creativity had, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with medium creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. In conventional learning, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with both medium and low creativity. At high and medium creativity level, PBI, Guided Inquiry and Conventional Model provided the equally good learning achievement. Meanwhile, at low creativity level, PBI learning model provided learning achievement equally good to the conventional learning model did, and Conventional learning model provided learning achievement better than the Guided Inquiry learning model did.Keywords: PBI, Guided Inquiry, Conventional, Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION, INKUIRI TERBIMBING DAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BLORA Hanggara, Yudhi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) which learning model providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning, (2) which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity, and (3) in each creativity level, which one providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning model. In each learning model which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity. The population of research was all students of Junior High Schools throughout Blora Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 272 students: 92 in the first experiment class, 91 in the second experiment class, and 89 in the third experiment class. The result of research showed that: (1) PBI model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did, but provided learning achievement equally good to the Conventional learning model did and Conventional learning model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did; (2) the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with both medium and low creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. (3) In PBI and guided inquiry learning models, the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with low creativity had, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with medium creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. In conventional learning, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with both medium and low creativity. At high and medium creativity level, PBI, Guided Inquiry and Conventional Model provided the equally good learning achievement. Meanwhile, at low creativity level, PBI learning model provided learning achievement equally good to the conventional learning model did, and Conventional learning model provided learning achievement better than the Guided Inquiry learning model did.Keywords: PBI, Guided Inquiry, Conventional, Creativity
Pengembangan modul statistik berbasis PMR untuk meningkatkan kompetensi mahasiswa Hanggara, Yudhi; Agustyaningrum, Nina; hermansah, hermansah
Jurnal Mercumatika : Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.327 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan dan mengetahui kualitas produk berupa modul statistic berbasis PMR yang sesuai dengan kriteria kualitas yang ditetapkan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Developement, Implementation, Evaluation) yang terdiri dari 5 tahap yaitu tahap Analysis dengan menganalisis kebutuhan, kurikulum, karakteristik mahasiswa DAN ANALISIS MATERI, tahap Design, tahap pengembangan (developement), tahap Implementasi dan tahap Evaluation. Desain penilaian produk yang digunakan adalah desain deskriptif. Penilaian produk dilakukan oleh tiga validator yaitu dosen pendidikan matematika pengampu mata kuliah Statistik. Objek penelitian adalah kualitas bahan ajar berdasarkan kriteria tertentu. Data penelitian berupa data tentang proses penyusunan dan pengembangan bahan ajar serta data kualitas bahan ajar yang disusun. Instrumen penelitian berupa lembar validasi berbentuk check list tentang kualitas bahan ajar. Data kualitas produk yang dihasilkan berbentuk deskriptif kemudian diubah menjadi skor 1, 2, 3, dan 4,  untuk kriteria sangat kurang, kurang, baik, dan sangat baik. Modul yang dikembangkan mencakup 6 pokok bahasan. Hasil penilaian dari 3 validator memperoleh  hasil pencapaian pada aspek kelayakan isi 86,11%, kelayakan penyajian 87,04%, dan kelayakan kebahasaan 89,29%. Rata-rata pencapaian kelayakan adalah 87,48% dan termasuk pada kategori sangat baik. Artinya bahan ajar yang dikembangakan telah memenuhi standar kualitas yang ditetapkan dan layak untuk digunakan.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED INSTRUCTION, INKUIRI TERBIMBING DAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BLORA Hanggara, Yudhi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) which learning model providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning, (2) which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity, and (3) in each creativity level, which one providing better learning achievement, PBI, Guided Inquiry or Conventional learning model. In each learning model which students having better learning achievement, those with high, medium or low creativity. The population of research was all students of Junior High Schools throughout Blora Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 272 students: 92 in the first experiment class, 91 in the second experiment class, and 89 in the third experiment class. The result of research showed that: (1) PBI model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did, but provided learning achievement equally good to the Conventional learning model did and Conventional learning model provided better learning achievement than the guided inquiry model did; (2) the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with both medium and low creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. (3) In PBI and guided inquiry learning models, the students with high creativity had learning achievement better than those with low creativity had, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with medium creativity had, and the students with medium creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with low creativity had. In conventional learning, the students with high creativity had learning achievement equally good to those with both medium and low creativity. At high and medium creativity level, PBI, Guided Inquiry and Conventional Model provided the equally good learning achievement. Meanwhile, at low creativity level, PBI learning model provided learning achievement equally good to the conventional learning model did, and Conventional learning model provided learning achievement better than the Guided Inquiry learning model did.Keywords: PBI, Guided Inquiry, Conventional, Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBING PROMPTING DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI MINAT BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 3 BATAM Hanggara, Yudhi; Alfionita, Vina
PYTHAGORAS Vol 4, No 2 (2015): PYTHAGORAS JOURNAL
Publisher : PYTHAGORAS

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.601 KB)

Abstract

This research aims to find out:  (1) is there any difference between the learning outcomes of students who were given the treatment model of Probing Prompting with Discovery Learning. (2) is there any difference between the learning outcomes of students who have an interest to learn high, medium and low. (3) is there any difference between the learning outcomes of students who were given the treatment modelsof Probing Prompting and Discovery Learning teach level of interest in learning. (4) is there any difference between the learning outcomes of students who have an interest to learn high, medium and lowon each model of learning. The sample of research consisted of 75 students: 37 in the first experiment class, and 38 in the second experiment class.The result of research showed that : (1) the Discovery Learning model outcomes learning better than the Probing Prompting model did. (2) The students with high interest in learning had learning outcome better than those with moderate interest in learning  did, the students with high interest in learning had learning outcomme better than those with low interest in learning did, and the  students with moderate interest in learning had learning outcome better than those with low interest in learning did. (3) the students with high, moderate and low interest in learning on Discovery Learning model had learning outcome better than the Probing Prompting model did. (4) on the Discovery Learning and Probing Prompting model, The students with high interest in learning had learning outcome better than those with moderate and low interest in learning  did, and the  students with moderate interest in learning had learning outcome better than those with low interest in learning did.Keywords: ProbingPrompting, Discovery Learning, interest in learning mathematics, Mathematics learning outcome.
ESPERIMENTASI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK DAN PEMBELAJARAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 25 BATAM TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Hanggara, Yudhi; Suhardi, Rio Mardani
DIMENSI Vol 5, No 3 (2016): Volume 5 No.3 2016
Publisher : DIMENSI

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.097 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang diberi perlakuan pendekatan pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik dengan pendekatan pembelajaran Saintifik. (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, auditori, dan kinestetik. (3) Interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran (PMR dan Saintifik) dengan gaya belajar siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMPN 25 Batam Kelas VIII tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik Cluster Random Sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak dua kelas yaitu kelas ekperimen dan kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah nilai tes ujian tengah semester I, angket gaya belajar, dan tes hasil belajar matematika. Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas menggunakan metode Lilliefors dan uji homogenitas menggunakan metode Bartlett. Dengan  = 0,05, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal dan mempunyai variansi yang homogen. Uji keseimbangan terhadap data kemampuan awal matematika menggunakan analisis variansi satu jalan dengan sel tak sama diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kedua kelas eksperimen mempunyai kemampuan awal matematika yang seimbang. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Pendekatan pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik menghasilkan hasil belajar lebih baik daripada pendekatan pembelajaran Saintifik . (2) Hasil belajar siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori lebih baik dari pada hasil belajar siswa dengan gaya belajar visual dan kinestetik, kemudian hasil belajar siswa dengan gaya belajar visual sama baiknya dnegan hasil belajar siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetik (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran (PMR dan saintifik) dengan gaya belajar siswa.
KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DITINJAU DARI HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP KELAS VII Hanggara, Yudhi; Jafri, Fauzan
Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika Volume 9 Nomor 1 Februari 2016
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.79 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Efektifitas model pembelajaran NHT ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam; (2) Efektifitas model pembelajaran TAI ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam, dan (3) perbedaan model pembelajaran NHT dan TAI ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam. Populasi dalan penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam. Sampel diambil dengan teknik Cluster Random Sampling. Hasil Penelitian Menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Model pembelajaran NHT efektif ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam; (2) Model pembelajaran TAI tidak efektif ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam dan (3) Model pembelajaran NHT lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran TAI ditinjau dari hasil belajar siswa kelas VII SMP Tunas Baru Jin Seung Batam.Kata kunci: Efektifitas,  Numbered Heads Together, Teams Assisted Individualization
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN 50 BATAM TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Hanggara, Yudhi; Wajubaidah, Wajubaidah
PYTHAGORAS Vol 5, No 2 (2016): PYTHAGORAS
Publisher : , PRODI. MATEMATIKA, RIAU KEPULAUAN UNIVERSITY, BATAM, INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.207 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang diberi perlakuan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD. (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi, sedang dan rendah. (3) Interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMPN 50 Batam Kelas VII tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik Cluster Random Sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw menghasilkan hasil belajar lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD. (2) Hasil belajar siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi lebih baik dari pada hasil belajar siswa dengan motivasi belajar sedang dan rendah, kemudian hasil belajar siswa dengan motivasi belajar sedang sama baiknya dengan hasil belajar siswa dengan motivasi belajar rendah. (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan motivasi belajar siswa.Kata Kunci:  Jigsaw, STAD dan Motivasi Belajar  Abstract. This research aims to find out:  (1) The difference between the student learning outcomes who were given the treatment by cooperative learning model type Jigsaw and cooperative learning model type STAD. (2) The difference between the student learning outcomes who have high, medium and low learning motivation. (3) The interaction between cooperative learning model type Jigsaw and cooperative learning model type STAD againts student learning motivation. This research was quasi-experimental research with a 2x3 factorial design. The population of research was all students in grade 7 of SMPN 50 Batam for 2015/2016 academic year. Sampling is assosiated by cluster random sampling. The result of research showed that : (1) The Cooperative Leraning Model type Jigsaw had learnig outcomes better than the Cooperative Learning Model type STAD (2) The students with high learning motivation had learning outcome better than those with medium and low learning motivation. While, the students with medium learning motivation had learning outcome as good as those with low learning motivation. (3) There is no interaction between cooperative learning model type Jigsaw and cooperative learning model type STAD againts student’s learning motivation. Keywords: Jigsaw, STAD and Learning Motivation.
KORELASI ANTARA KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAHDENGAN TEKNIK POLYADENGAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIIMTs USB SAGULUNG BATAM TAHUN PELAJARAN2013/2014 Ritonga, Wati; Hanggara, Yudhi
CAHAYA PENDIDIKAN Vol 1, No 1 (2015): CAHAYA PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : FKIP, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (96.573 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya hubungan antara kemampuan komunikasi matematika dan pemecahan masalah dengan teknik polya dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VII MTs USB Sagulung Batam Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII dan sampelnya adalah siswa kelas VII yang berjumlah 96 siswa. Instrument yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah instrument tes berbentuk pilihan ganda. Sebelum dipergunakan untuk mengambil data responden dilakukan uji validitas dan reabilitas. Uji persyaratan analisis dilakukan dengan uji normalitas dengan menggunakan uji chi kuadrat. Dari hasil perhitungan diperoleh bahwa data berdistribusi normal. Uji hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji korelasi ganda. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh sebesar 1,9 dan Ftabel sebesar 3,09. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara kemampuan komunikasi matematika dan pemecahan masalah dengan teknik Polya secara bersama-sama terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa VII MTs USB Sagulung Batam Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Kata kunci : kemampuan komunikasi matematika, pemecahan masalah dengan teknik Polya, hasil belajar matematika
ESTIMASIVALUE AT RISK DENGANGENERALIZED STUDENT-T DISTRIBUTION UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI RETURN INVESTASI Hermansah, Hermansah; Hanggara, Yudhi
JURNAL DIMENSI Vol 6, No 3 (2017): JURNAL DIMENSI (NOVEMBER 2017)
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.866 KB)

Abstract

Dalam artikel ini dijelaskan tentang estimasi kerugian Value at Risk menggunakan Generalized Student-t Distribution untuk return aset tunggal. Generalized Student-t Distribution merupakan perluasan dari distribusi normal standar dan chi square dsitribution.  Generalized Student-t Distribution memiliki sifat yang thin tailed dan simetris. Sehingga estimasi Value at Risk dengan pendekatan Generalized Student-t Distribution diharapkan dapat memberikan estimasi kerugian yang baik untuk data yang memiliki sifat  thin tailed dan simetris. Kata kunci:Return, Value at Risk dan Distribusi Student-t.