Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN METODE PROBLEM SOLVING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR

Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (373.232 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models onlearning achievement viewed from students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared werecooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) with problem solving method, Two Stay TwoStray (TSTS) and conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research using 3?3 factorialdesign. The populations of the research were all students of Junior High School (SMP) onKaranganyar Regency. The samples of the research were the eight grade students of SMP Negeri 1Tasikmadu, SMP Negeri 2 Jaten, and SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar containing 282 students (94students for first experimental class, 93 students for second experimental class, and 95 students forcontrol class). The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. In collectingthe data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. Test was used to get the students’learning achievement data and questionnaire was used to get multiple intelligences data. Thetechnique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The result of the research showsthat: (1) TSTS with problem solving method is better than TSTS and conventional in producingthe students’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile TSTS is as good as conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (2) students having high multipleintelligences are better than those having middle and low multiple intelligences in producing thestudents’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile students having middle multipleintelligences are better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing Mathematicslearning achievement; (3) (a) the students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by usingTSTS with problem solving method are better than those having middle or low multipleintelligences in producing the students’ Mathematics learning achievement whereas studentshaving middle multiple intelligences have better learning achievement than those who have lowmultiple intelligences; (b) The students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTSare better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing the students’ Mathematicslearning achievement but the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS areas good as those who have middle multiple intelligences; (c) The students taught by usingconventional having high, middle or low multiple intelligences produce same learningachievement; (4) (a) the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS withproblem solving method are as good as who are taught by using TSTS and conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (b) the students having middle multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method are better than those who aretaught by using TSTS and conventional in producing students’ mathematics learning achievementbut they are as good as those who are taught by using TSTS whereas the students taught by usingTSTS are as good as those who taught by using conventional; (c) the students having low multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method, TSTS, and conventional havethe same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords : TSTS, problem solving, multiple intelligences

EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN METODE PROBLEM SOLVING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR

Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models onlearning achievement viewed from students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared werecooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) with problem solving method, Two Stay TwoStray (TSTS) and conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research using 3?3 factorialdesign. The populations of the research were all students of Junior High School (SMP) onKaranganyar Regency. The samples of the research were the eight grade students of SMP Negeri 1Tasikmadu, SMP Negeri 2 Jaten, and SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar containing 282 students (94students for first experimental class, 93 students for second experimental class, and 95 students forcontrol class). The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. In collectingthe data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. Test was used to get the students’learning achievement data and questionnaire was used to get multiple intelligences data. Thetechnique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The result of the research showsthat: (1) TSTS with problem solving method is better than TSTS and conventional in producingthe students’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile TSTS is as good as conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (2) students having high multipleintelligences are better than those having middle and low multiple intelligences in producing thestudents’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile students having middle multipleintelligences are better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing Mathematicslearning achievement; (3) (a) the students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by usingTSTS with problem solving method are better than those having middle or low multipleintelligences in producing the students’ Mathematics learning achievement whereas studentshaving middle multiple intelligences have better learning achievement than those who have lowmultiple intelligences; (b) The students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTSare better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing the students’ Mathematicslearning achievement but the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS areas good as those who have middle multiple intelligences; (c) The students taught by usingconventional having high, middle or low multiple intelligences produce same learningachievement; (4) (a) the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS withproblem solving method are as good as who are taught by using TSTS and conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (b) the students having middle multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method are better than those who aretaught by using TSTS and conventional in producing students’ mathematics learning achievementbut they are as good as those who are taught by using TSTS whereas the students taught by usingTSTS are as good as those who taught by using conventional; (c) the students having low multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method, TSTS, and conventional havethe same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords : TSTS, problem solving, multiple intelligences

EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN METODE PROBLEM SOLVING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR

Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models onlearning achievement viewed from students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared werecooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) with problem solving method, Two Stay TwoStray (TSTS) and conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research using 3?3 factorialdesign. The populations of the research were all students of Junior High School (SMP) onKaranganyar Regency. The samples of the research were the eight grade students of SMP Negeri 1Tasikmadu, SMP Negeri 2 Jaten, and SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar containing 282 students (94students for first experimental class, 93 students for second experimental class, and 95 students forcontrol class). The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. In collectingthe data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. Test was used to get the students’learning achievement data and questionnaire was used to get multiple intelligences data. Thetechnique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The result of the research showsthat: (1) TSTS with problem solving method is better than TSTS and conventional in producingthe students’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile TSTS is as good as conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (2) students having high multipleintelligences are better than those having middle and low multiple intelligences in producing thestudents’ Mathematics learning achievement, meanwhile students having middle multipleintelligences are better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing Mathematicslearning achievement; (3) (a) the students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by usingTSTS with problem solving method are better than those having middle or low multipleintelligences in producing the students’ Mathematics learning achievement whereas studentshaving middle multiple intelligences have better learning achievement than those who have lowmultiple intelligences; (b) The students’ having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTSare better than those who have low multiple intelligences in producing the students’ Mathematicslearning achievement but the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS areas good as those who have middle multiple intelligences; (c) The students taught by usingconventional having high, middle or low multiple intelligences produce same learningachievement; (4) (a) the students having high multiple intelligences taught by using TSTS withproblem solving method are as good as who are taught by using TSTS and conventional inproducing students’ Mathematics learning achievement; (b) the students having middle multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method are better than those who aretaught by using TSTS and conventional in producing students’ mathematics learning achievementbut they are as good as those who are taught by using TSTS whereas the students taught by usingTSTS are as good as those who taught by using conventional; (c) the students having low multipleintelligences taught by using TSTS with problem solving method, TSTS, and conventional havethe same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords : TSTS, problem solving, multiple intelligences

KOMPARASI HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN POLA BELAJAR BIMBINGAN TUTOR SEBAYA SECARA KELOMPOKDAN KLASIKAL

Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains Vol 3, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.368 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar matematika yang belajar menggunakan pola belajar bimbingan tutor sebaya secara kelompok dan klasikal; (2) hasil belajar matematika manakah yang lebih tinggi antara yang belajar menggunakan pola belajar bimbingan tutor sebaya secara kelompok dengan yang klasikal pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 4 Metro. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif dengan bentuk penelitian komparatif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 4 Metro. Sampel diambil secara acak dua kelas dengan kemampuan matematika yang setara. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan uji t. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang belajar menggunakan Pola Belajar Bimbingan Tutor Sebaya secara Kelompok lebih tinggi daripada rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang belajar menggunakan Pola Belajar Bimbingan Tutor Sebaya secara Klasikal.Kata Kunci: Pola Belajar, Tutor Sebaya, Hasil Belajar Matematika

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN NOTES UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN AFEKTIF MAHASISWA DALAM KURIKULUM KKNI ( DEVELOPMENT OF NON TEST INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURING STUDENT AFFECTED ABILITY IN CURRICULUM KKNI)

Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 7 No 1: (2017)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (436.529 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan mendeskripsikan pengembangan instrumen nontes untuk mengukur kemampuan afektif mahasiswa dalam kurikulum KKNI. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan model pengembangan menggunakan P4TK yaitu spesifikasi instrumen, menulis instrumen, menentukan skala instrumen, sistem penskoran, telaah instrumen, merakit instrumen, uji coba instrumen, analisis hasil uji coba, perbaikan instrumen. Hasi penelitian diperoleh 1) Kisi-kisi penyusunan instrumen nontes untuk mengukur kemampuan afektif mahasiswa dalam kurikulum KKNI dalam penelitian ini telah cukup valid dan reliabel; 2) Hasil validitas instrumen nontes untuk mengukur kemampuan afektif mahasiswa dalam kurikulum KKNI telah memenuhi persyaratan; 3) Reliabilitas intrumen nontes untuk mengukur kemampuan afektif mahasiswa dalam kurikulum KKNI hasilnya tinggi dan instrumen layak untuk digunakan; 4) Hasil uji coba penggunaan instrumen nontes untuk mengukur kemampuan afektif mahasiswa dalam kurikulum KKNI diperoleh pada masing-masing soal yang berjumlah 15 semua hasilnya baik. Kata kunci: Instrumen Nontes, Kemampuan Afektif Mahasiswa, Kurikulum KKNI Abstract This research aimed to describe the development of nontest instrument to measure students affective ability in KKNI curriculum. The research method used is descriptive method with development model using P4TK that is instrument specification, instrument writing, instrument scale, scoring system, instrument study, instrument assembling, instrument test, test result analysis, instrument improvement. The result of research is 1) Nontes instrument preparation grid to measure student affective ability in KKNI curriculum in this research has been quite valid and reliable; 2) The result of validity of nontest instrument to measure student affective ability in KKNI curriculum has fulfilled the requirement; 3) Nontest intruments reliability to measure students affective ability in high quality KKNI curriculum and appropriate instruments for use; 4) The test result of the use of nontest instrument to measure affective ability of students in KKNI curriculum is obtained on each of the 15 questions all good results. Keywords: Non test instrument, Student affective Ability, Curriculum KKNI

Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika

SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) Vol 3, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (451.625 KB)

Abstract

The aim of the research is to study: 1) how prospective mathematics teachers plan character education in learning; 2) how prospective mathematics teachers carry out character education in learning; 3) how prospective mathematics teachers assess character education in learning. The research is a qualitative descriptive research. The research subjects are IKIP PGRI Pontianak teachers, especially those in Mathematics Education study program. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that. 1) Prospective mathematics teachers plan well the character education, internalize it in the KKNI curriculum and design it according to the indicators set in the SNP-PT guidelines. 2) Prospective mathematics teachers carry out well the character education. 3) Prospective mathematics teachers assess very well the character education as an improvement in character in the study program environment